Wood or Carbon ?

“ Nature of the sensation”.


Each one and all oar has a “sensation” only and particular to for transmiting a negative or positive sensation if return to the user. The physical act of row lives art and science in combination with the biomechanics to generate pulse and force the belong most of indeed for each attacks done, the rower “feels” the water and the canoes answer through the oar. Summarizing this “talks” to them.

As strange as this it can appear; it is doubts of the so much that you more experienced becomes, which you more sensitive will be to each rowing and exercised. Each rower by canoe creates a connection becomes intimate with his oar, thence become extensions each other, with parts of one all.
The more you rows, I become intimate most this relation becomes
Alem of the technical merits of laminas of his shovels drawing and size; length of the stem and kind, the material that each one only built influences vastly, determined about everything your nature and “sensation” That befit you, thence this “talk” to you in a way positive and charming or negative and uninteresting. Thus, carbon oars against the wooden pronounce of forms entirely diferentes,combinando very several information to the preferences user affect each rower individually whose.

Having established this reasonably direct factor , only depends of the preference, the referring argument which is superior, given a passive matter, because in fact the final tests are in the user's hand and in the comfort factor that he feels or not.

The factor of the weight (or fault of this) in the carbon oars is from far the sale singular advantage. Lightness is (largely) what all of them they want and that the carbon supplies. around 450 grams against 900 grams of the wooden, we are us facing almost half the weight , for muitos,se not most rowers , weight always becomes the only and more important factor, put weight is not everything!

carbon oars they develop around 1985 to calm waters, canoeing marathons were naturally proposed and for good reasons, especificadamente for an only kind of rowing.
wrench indices for this modality, they are around 80 attacks for minute and require retaking high indices. The weight of the oars during this stage of the development of the sport was still introduces a great matter between oar manufacturers was and still introduces a great matter between oar manufacturers that try hopelessly reduce, the weight of their oars and then monopolize the market, what it points initially at wooden compositions, glass foam and fiber, tie it allows technologically the carbon oars production.

During the same manufacturers period it by canoe came back for the alone use carbon, bringing the weight from an OC1 for the house of the 15kg.
The sport was sent to minimum weights - which for some for our members soil canoes or double were created, but not our pertaining to a group canoes owed Á regulations. softer indices of attacks associates with hawaiian and countless canoeing properties of carries for pertaining to a group canoes also highlight some of the great difference among her disciplines to do not mention the nature of the environments in which they compete.
Many of the frustrations of the majority of the followers of hawaiian canoeing come of other canoeing or kaiaque sportsmen, or still of cultural factors of our sport , irrational barriers preventing your evolution, visualizing little placement for such considerations inside the competitive canoeing whether you come of other canoeing or kaiaque modalities and always has been using carbon oars, then the notion of using a version weighed most wooden will naturally appear of low-technology and primitive for comparison.


Walter Guild – CAN0ESPORTS HAWAII
In my opinion the weight of the boat and the load in the rower is one would be consideration regarding the oar material choose it. It remind that with the lightness of the carbon oars they are extremely rigid.
If the stem of an oar not flexiona, then the load of the shovel is transferred directly to the body.
Their bodies link first the elbow after the shoulder, causing exhaustion and damage. It is very important to do not use one laminates (shovel) which is very large for you when he use inflexible stems (carbon) , especially if the load vary in the rowing as at sea open, windstorm, turned, released, etc. you should think it can alleviate the effort of harder oars reducing the size of the shovel and truly sinking the oar in water. I personally prefer wood in O.C.6, with the weight only of the arm, allows certain flexibility in the stem that alleviates the weariness in the body.

Walter's Vision in mention the load quantity in a pertaining to a group canoe (oc6) against a soil and the variation of such loads for the rower turn the oar during some situations together with the comprehension of the potential for damages and the benefits that the flexibility can offer, inherent a wooden oar, give rational concepts to to be pondered regarding the use of the carbon instead of the wood in canoes grupais.Resumindo he prefers wooden oars for oc6 and carbon for oc1. . For ultima part of this affirmation is much more an observation based on an opinion pesoal.

For the ones that to very concluded that carbon oars are appropriated in pertaining to a group canoes, only based in the lightness that gives to the soil or double (or even kayaks) can perhaps learn, which the load increases promocionalmente with more weighed vessels and grow the factors of drag, thence perhaps the merits of the carbon oars start to lose their advantages.
Then we consider the opinion associates details to the carbon oars against the wooden. While I have been expressing that truly the rower is that determines whether the sensation is positive or negative, there are some factors of acceptable opinion associates to these oars.
We can start with the lightness, which you can think it produced an oar more manobrável, actually these require more care in the positioning and handling being easily carried in strong winds.
due to the inertia associate failure to the weight leaf, you should keep constant attention in the control of the oar at all times
Beiradas with knife style give an entrance and clean exit in the water for the carbon oars.
Thence provide them a cut sensation”, what it can get used some to this. Of the moment that you applies force Á this you note that there is little or no flexibility through the shovel for the stem. It is constant the sensation during the whole ataque.Devido to the high resistance tensil of the shovels, they is clear do not warp in the side of lamina,daí are do not accommodate by any means waters in comes back.
Having establishment this reasonably direct factor only depends of the preference to the referring argument Á which is superior, given a passive matter, because in fact the final tests are in the user's hand and in the comfort factor that he feels or not.


OTHER VISION :

The carbon oars can generate as result an “agitation” that is more possible if you do not keep the tension and care in the control of the laminates by the stem. Consequentemente carbon shovels generally are smaller with tiny edges in comparison to his wooden doubles, due to the use and control easiness in water as well as can alleviate the flexibility lack in the stem reducing the load for the rower.

EXIT OF THE OAR OF THE DILUTES :

In the hour of the exit the differences between wood and carbon become very apparent, once that there is very little or no jump factor” in the carbon oar . “He lets the water “dead” without backlash thence the sensation”. of have something of uninteresting”.In comparison to the “jump” or lash” associates to the wooden oars, adjusts the retaking of the very easy attack in your “sensation”.But you gets used with this.
Once rested the rower, thence comes to the phase of the retaking and due to the weight lack of the carbons also inertia fault, almost as that shooting a punishment instead of a gravel, he does not travel about his own weight so well. Like result your return footpath control should be more methodical and contained. Rowing in strong wind can form new gotten used followers to these oars and lots of rowers actually they prefer some weight and substantiates in their oars in this situação.Contrastando with this, wooden oars introduce very opposite qualities. Flexibility in several graos, what it creates some delay in the footprint” or “anchorage point” and certain force stroke when the stem curved about pressure when a little deforms of the shovel (sometimes) happens, before reaching a rigidity point, during the exit phase (rest) as mentioned, includes a “whip” creating a stimulant sensation that helps the adjustment of the attack in the retaking, while the extra weight can assist during strong wind and shaken waters. Then what everything this does it mean? Summarizing, the tension high resistance and therefore the qualities of the rigid carbon are doubts brutaller to the body for not existing “shock absorption” being rewarded mostly to the shoulders and Weight elbows is the key. The weight of them allows attacks associates high rates to OC1 and OC2 where rowers reach marks of 80 attacks p/ minutes or above, efforts are being done to create composed dispositions, the which ones “imitate” the qualities of the wood, in several degrees, comprehending that also need to consider the “dollar carbon Oars factor still are in the category of exotic to for not being a cheap item. Unpretentious and simple, they so much fall into your budget or not when they approach the purchase of two by the price of one in any places. Told this, I dare myself to comment that if the price was correct, much more rower could be using them.
Do put how can we measure correctly the convenience of the carbon oars as an alternative gun if do it use in pertaining to a group canoes? we visualize Australia as test case, where for more than six years, carbon oars has been being allowed, should be significant the fact of that even today, no crew does it row with oars whether carbono.É a price or performance matter?



DON STONEMAN – Cambridge ONTÁRIO CANADA

This treatment deposition with rowers of the point of view maratonista more than of the point of view of hawaiian canoeing. I bought my first BARTON in 1987. I myself resisted to the change due to the cost until I saw the folks from here buying. I talked to an individuals couple in particular to who respects vastly due to her manual abilities. Anyone of them it can build almost anything that they want. When they compare for graffiti (carbon) . I way a light, for thus dizer.Dito this, there are some defects, and the biggest deficiency is the price. I used a timex, not a rolex, is I had to save and to join to buy that first BARTON.Posso comprehend as the youngest will have problems financed to the purchase. Before anything, I think we have to do what it is good for the sport, and if keep the low-prices so that all of them they can compete in an equal age field is necessary, which is.

Australia is an emerging parents, where rowers could get the money for such oars. Australia produce some of the canoeing best crews and carries to seriate her competitions, however with carbono.Preço and improprieties oars absence seem to be the main factors, talking to crews in Australia, the price of the carbon is prohibitive and wooden oars carries and well done are preferred, they stand the blows when they are squashed against the board of the canoe in strong winds. They allow amendments, they are easily reparable and definitively considered more dispensable
Anyway, they seem to be exceptions for how much I know other crews by the world (Canada and Costa east of the United States) which use the carbon and believe in this. I have to seek profoundly to see the reasons of the why and it concludes that most destas teams consists in rowers of OC1 eOC2 that are become very attached to their “crooks” of carbon and try perhaps hardened their bodies for use of these in the majority destas crews, of which I do not am sure that they have experienced genuinely wild seas and rowed in windstorms, where the deficiencies of the carbon oars use can become more apparent
Differences in the referring world regulations to the use of the carbon in pertaining to a group canoes will go always limit the use of this, but it seems that the utilization of the use of the carbon for soil canoes and double, where the load is the damage risk for oar and rower is very smaller is more appropriated and thence your popularity. Particular are free to acquire their carbon oars and to use them exclusively.
Convince all a team to also acquire a carbon oars set is difficult – neither all of them are in position of such. Besides amount of money, the facts seem to indicate that wooden oars are the best nominees (already in this time) for pertaining to a group canoes in the majority of the situations. Interresantemente, lots of producers of wooden oars have trying to copy carbon oars, producing smaller shovels, double shoulders, blades of concave side, and an attempt to reproduce the same item for less money – with more weight is clear. Laminas concave require symmetry perfect is extreme rigidity frequentemente absent in wooden oars, what means that such oars should demonstrate both the properties, being the rigidity the most difficult of reach once that such models in wood always fail in perform itself as oughted to.




Al CHING – ROUND BEACH CALIFORNIA


All right in announce the merits of an oar ultraleve, but to let be understood that reduced weight is going to save energy that will be canalized for a stronger or efficient rowing is incorrect. I am sure that an oar ultraleve is great and did not eliminate anything thence, but I feel hardly regarding the rationality. By my experience, rowers are trained sufficiently to run long distancias with oars of different weights affect very their speeds. Some rowers prefer a small oar weighed most in oceanic waves and windstorms. The help their weight balanços and thence the rhythm. Ultraleves are great for prolonged wrenches where a rower prefers less mass and maxim energy. Maratonistas we benefit with this. However recent rowers are narrowing the weight difference and many by canoe hawaiian races can becomes longer before the weight factor come to count. Beyond of these, the best crews still will win using the more very drawn oars. In a certain time when EMPOA CLUB OF CANOEING was dominant team and came for a race of long distance and forgot about their oars. They had to borrow several clubs oars. And of course they received the training oars of all the rowers and not the oars of competition . These belonged to blades of wet compensated with stems of massive pinewoods. Worse yet, they were not all uniform. All of us think would finally have a chance of wining. In the final, Empoa killed in the start, during and at the end of the race. They finished being some points in the horizon , and we, as usual, at the same place with our best oars.

There are some formulas loose always dispersed thereabout, whence you receives the additional weight that a “lumberman” has of his compared oar to a carbon oar , which when risen of water X number of times' in X number of minutes', it works to the equivalent to load a sedan during the route of the race. There is not doubts that a lighter oar than this, it seems impressive on paper. However I do not be a space scientist and continued apprehensive in accept such it formulates literally. Such theory I imagine is based on rise physically the oar of water and “to load him” by the retaking until the attack point.
wooden oars float, thence when you pushes them downwards diluting them want to jump outside water in the exit point. Consequentemente weight in this hour is not a matter. as soon as it lets the water, these enter aerial environment, seventy less dense times than the sea, where (in the case the wood) he jumps or “backlash” about tension in an ascending trajectory while return to your rest state. As mentioned, this adds comfortable action, stimulant sensation, assisting the biomechanics action in the retaking of the attack.
The rotation of the whole back ( trunk) , with the action agreement of fist and arm, on departure Monday shoots the oar onwards by the retaking phase until the attack point. Once in fact “thrown”, the own additional mass of a wooden oar, traveling in a horizontal plan in fact tries a lightness degree happened of the gravitation and fall forces. We also need to add the flight factor”. As the oar this “planing” during the retaking, he acts more as a wing and, therefore “it flies” for this stage reproducing again the weight. It seems that need to calculate a “start balancing” And “weight weight” had it it base on something at the same time more cientifico than we are get used to working? We finally are going to argue the merits of which is better, we go to the less fazê him with bases of reasonable reasonings, in the lack of formulates a little mathematical, which justify outlet vessels and terms variations analyzing all the factors, biomecânicos and technical to arrive to some conclusion related been worth to our sport for oar is not another. Finally both have their places.


Walter GUILD - CAN0ESPORTS HAWAII


There are some disadvantages in light oars, as well as in oars ultra-hard. I have been using all, but it do not would affirm in vain, which “the lighter the better, always”. Not that lightness and rigidity to do not be great, porêm exist more factors than this.

And thence with the “tradition” and do it owe everybody smoothe us in relation than are the oars done? We owe everybody leave pressuring our associations to change regulations that allow a policy of anything serves? If you thus are we could activate an “auto-administration process” where will the preference be established by the rowers as it has been being Australia's Case? When we will prevent the destruction of such values?
Certainly we are already in a crossroads while we enter in a serve as apprentice of relative commitment, according to which, wooden oars are more constant than compositions reinforced of carbon or kevlar, pasted or covered with glass resin and fiber for reinforcement and protection, causing associations such as the hawaiian association of races that attends to her rules for only wood just as they has been reaching your ideal properties.

In seen of this should be thanked us by are at least able of row world-wide with tip models. Different from boatmen of the dragon that had to resist using oars of the age of the darkness. The fact is that, inside the hawaiian canoeing we row anyway with models lent of Polynesia, Badly, Micronésia, Native-american, Anglo-american and beyond; have thence to accept how at least already made concessions. It owes this, now apply itself to the kind of material with which the oar is built. In spite of everything, the models are up-to-date with the TECHNOLOGY OF THE MOVEMENT, therefore because the material should not be as well?

Being this way, have been conceding. Such benefits that clarify the notion that the permission of the use of the carbon, it seems relatively insignificant and in pertaining to a group canoes, to the point that anybody simply ignores the tradition of everything, we all appreciate our rowings with or without carbon. Thence, because belittle “what” it is due to the “reason it of being” or is that too much? I find although if care for “sensation” that wooden oars recall the primitive rustic, sense of return to the origins, what it can be debatable, put they are merits that benefit the sport.
glass fiber canoes have been the production cost nowadays, fomented the easy duplication, reducing the pressure in the extinction of the HOISTS KOA and insured to the sport a successful expansion outside Hawaii being available to the masses. This exit of the hoists Koa was essential and inevitable. Contrasting perhaps with what can be told of the transition of the wood for the carbon, since this results in larger expense and the raw materials for oars construction are countless, thwarting thus the reason of changing. An alternation in the regulation base itself-went simply in the performance, very although, bases these being passiveis of questionamento.


TERRY WALLACE- HAWAII

For the ones that plan to run in the channel Kaliwi (molokai), know that HCRA determined recently for Hawaii's State for wooden oars only. “My palpitates is that carbon oars will not be allowed in the races”. In Wahine Kekai - Molokai; HoB. If Do not I know what “wooden oars only” mean? Will come back for inteiriços of 2 kg ? Today all the wooden oars are composed. It means, the oars have glue and varnish at least. Can they own glass poliuretano and fiber tips (sawyer) or are graffiti's reinforcements (carbon) in the shovels (black blade). irregular oars? Although thus what they talk, probably is not what they mean. what they meant, (giving an opinion once again). Was, which invent a carbon fiber oar. But anybody he wanted to specify an oar in particular. Now that there is more than one company doing carbon fiber oars. What to do it do? Perhaps the best thing, as in the canoes, be to establish a limit. It tell and not less than so many grams.


Walter GUILD - CAN0ESPORTS HAWAII

I was the table with the projects committee of HCRA arguing the referring considerations to the oars construction in Hawaii basically the committee recognized that wooden oars has been being finishing with stronger and durable coatings. it also was accepted that in a number of cases a glass fiber light layer has been being used when light and fragile woods are used in the given oar construction. These kinds of “finishing” do not seem to violate the regulation spirit of the wooden oars. If an oar is moulded in wood and after covered with other material for finishing. I do not think anybody will have problems. Whether a shovel or stem is hollow and after cover with laminated wooden, do not surprise it is not allowed or if used in Hawaii for a race and post-detected. Receive disqualification degrees. In case of doubts, get a regulation of the committee of the organization before the event and you always will be open.

GREEP BARTON- EPIC PADDLES , Inc.

When you wishes the Maximum, it is very difficult for the wood accompany the performance of the synthetic (carbon fiber, resin epóxi, kevlan etc. .) every time occurs a revolution in the equipment of any sport always exist traditionalistic that will tell how new materials never will equip the sensation of the wood, but after some years the tip competitors do not use other thing or else material sintéticos,eles need to be linked in tudo,como have been dressing in esqui,canoagem of marathon and all kayak esportivo.Com material recentes,você the kinds can manufacture lighter, resistant oars and duráveis,podem until be done to agree the flexible standard of the wood with the right matters and determinations of fibra.Muitos short distance rowers still use madeira,mas boats owed to the weight restrictions that eliminate the advantage of the composed; does not understand badly, do not have anything against wooden your oars beauty does not compare to a synthetic. I use wooden oars for OC6 are required due to by varias regulation competitions. All right for me if people want to let thus who decides are our organizations. However, if the rules change allowing carbon oars in all competitions OC6, I will change immediate, Do I foresee that all of them equip of tip will change for the carbon among of few anos.Novamente depends on nós,queremos we keep nearby of the traditions or do it to use each possible innovation? I am satisfied from both manners and am going to use any kinds of oars inside the rules.




TAY PERRY- HAWAII

Sooner or later I believe that the composed will overcome the wood in the arena of the hawaiian canoeing. As in fact there is a controversy about how much of “not - wood” exists nowadays in the oars being used in the canoeing competitions in Hawaii. The wooden percentile versus not wood has been being argued, however I do not know than appearance they will be able to determine, and to guarantee the how much of the oar is wood and the how much is not. I see all the clubs of the ivy endorsing the oars purely wooden (except by the glue) in their competitions by canoe Koa. This it can do some sense. It does not make sense force the rowers to use wooden oars while they row glass fiber canoes. Other thing to consider is that wooden oars nowadays cost less than the composed. This is the truth and when you considers oar in the new followers level.
That is important when it considers the giant number of children starting to row for clubs. wooden oars can be acquired in the band of 60 up to 80 dollars for those young that enter to the oar in comparison to the band of the 150 to 250 dollars or more for composed. I am sure that there is more, only that if they let me row what I want me am going to prefer to use my graffiti's oar.




Brad GILLESPIE – GILLESPIE PADDLES


In the rowing in calm waters, the things are different from hawaiian canoeing, more especially in the race of 6 men ( OC6) . For a reason, the emphasis this in the weight; of the canoe and the oars. Most competitions gives on shallow waters. Where the weight can influence in the race. Even that many of the races are long, above three hours, and if case have a more weighed oar is going to affect arms, it is ouch that this will happen.
In my opinion for great part, the weight of the oar is not going to affect rower's speed to any distance below time two hour. When I use the shovels ZAV, of course the weight difference is something very noticed. However of against the wind, they are difficult to handle and since the stem do not be slippery, having a drought sensation, the tendency to record their hands going of against the wind is more difficult of get. I like honestly carbon oars in some degree, if they are very drawn and row in a good, why not? It is just that for decades I have been watching fanatic rowers here in the United States turn their back for anything with weight above 340 grams. what it eliminates totally madeira.Não oars there are wooden oars in marathon competitions to dilutes stop. Weight is the dominant factor.
Interestingly, I have been building some wooden oars with 510 grams for some inhabitants of the continent (caiçaras) which went to the Molokai, and they really fell in love. I think they were surprised by manage really like of oars that did not think of less than 340 grams and one their until thought your times improved than with ZAV. Nothing surprising, I think lots of rowers would be surprised in discover that can be faster with wooden oars. The arguments about how much weight you also loads during the race course are ridiculous. The half inch that you rises the oar in fact with your trunk, it is not affected by the 300 extra grams risen during such short distance.
Finally, it is up to you rower. Your oar is your working tool. It chooses well, try all of all the ways and terms and by canoes hawaiian kinds,- You will be Juiz !



SOURCE: KANU CULTURE – VOLUME V- 1999



OPINION : OF Celso R. FILETTI

CARBON FIBER OAR
ADVANTAGES: CARRY , FORT , RESISTANT, ENTRANCE And GONE OUT FROM WATER LIMPA/SECA ( it cuts ÀGUA BETTER , WITHOUT SPREADING” WATER )
DISADVANTAGES: HIGH, SO RIGID PRICE THAT CAN HURT The SHOULDER And The ELBOW, IN THE WIND BY YOUR CARRIES WEIGHT CAN GO OUT FROM YOUR HAND, MATERIAL THAT SINKS (CARBON FIBER PLATE) NOT GIVING The EFFECT MOLA/REBOTE/CHICOTE TO RESUME The ROWING, TIMES CA NOTBE ACCEPTED IN INTERNATIONAL PROOFS.


WOODEN OAR
ADVANTAGES: it acts like IMPACTS SHOCK-ABSORBER, NOT HURTING SO MUCH THE ARTICULATIONS, CHEAPER, RUSTIC MATERIAL, DOES NOT RUN AWAY FROM THEIR ORIGINS, BUOY – THEREFORE it owns A SPRING EFFECT” THAT FAVORS The RETAKING OF THE ROWING , REPAIRS MORE FÁCIES
DISADVANTAGES: WEIGHT( NOWADAYS THE MANUFACTURERS ARE DECREASING CONSIDERABLY The WEIGHT )


OAR HIBRIDO ( MADEIRA/FIBRA OF CARBON)
ADVANTAGES: CUT OF CLEAN WATER, it absorbs IMPACTS FOR YOUR STEM BE WOODEN
DISADVANTAGES: HIGH PRICE, YOUR SHOVEL BELONGING TO CARBON FIBER DOES NOT OWN SPRING EFFECT.


SUMMARY: OF Celso R. FILETTI

YOU OWE IF ADAPT TO YOUR OAR
VOCE Is His Juiz
YOUR “SENSATION”OF BEING ROWING WELL Is The MOST IMPORTANT
IF you can CHOOSE, TEST SEVERAL MODELS And SEE WHICH THAT VOCE ADAPTS BETTER.
it has ATHLETES WHO ARE MORE Fortes OTHER FASTER THAT CAN INFLUENCE IN A GREAT OR SMALL SHOVEL, CONCÂVA (DUG) OR STRAIGHT LINE ( Lisa).
STILL THERE ARE PROOFS And DIFFERENT ROUTES, PROOFS OF SPEED (SPEED) And PROOFS OF CROSSING ( ENDURANCE) WHICH VOCE CAN CHANGE OAR THE KIND TAMBEM.

APTER PEOPLE CAN HELP IN THE CHOICE OF YOUR OAR: FABIO Paiva DA OPIUM, Sebastian CUATRINN OLYMPIC ROWER, LUIS OF THE PARALLEL 28, GRAND MATOZO,ETC.

HINT: OF Celso R. FILETTI

1)GIVE MORE VALUE TO THE TRAININGS And LESS TO THE EQUIPMENT
2)90% IS UP TO YOU , 10% OF YOUR EQUIPMENT
3)YOUR OAR Is YOUR TOOL IN WATER –CARES FOR WELL OF HIM

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


SALON ROWING ---- OAR IN DOOR ---- CONCEPT II ( C II)

For Leo Young
Bachelor in applied sciences (sporty science)
Bachelor in trade, graduate graduated and practise nutritionist, CSCS.

salon rower is a phenomenon relatively new for canoeing, having evolved of the salon oar increasing and published sport. The salon oar world championship attracts thousands of elite athletes and has been being disputed by ten years. The annual world classification introduces almost 30.000 adhesions with more than 60 paises and the calendar of competitions includes now more than 100 salon main championships.
The concept ergométrico of oar C II, initially developed in 1981 is the used mechanism so much in rowing as in salon oar and is used by teams of olympic oar world-wide as integral part of your training, inquiry and crews' selection.




ADAPTATIONS FOR ROWING

Using Vermont Adapter for aquatic rower together with the Concept Ergométrico of Oar C II you this apt to simulate indeed the shovel rowing only. Once that the adapter is initially installed, it carries less of a minute to change of oar for rowing and aim-versa. The adapter for rowing was engenhosamente drawn to simulate indeed biomecânicos of the rowing in the aquatic canoe. The best results were obtained keeping the stem of the more perpendicular oar the possible of the main string (and the string more main parallel of the possible ground) in the same way as if attentive to keep the perpendicular oar water when in the canoeing. Any relation on the possibility to cheat in ergométrico, giving excessively long attack are going to only result in smaller counting.


PERFORMANCE MONITOR


The concept ergométrico C II introduces a highly precious monitor of performance which allows direct comparison of times' and distant under environmental drastically different terms. The auto-recalibra monitor to each attack being able to detect and to immediately correct any changes in the circulation and density of the air originating of ventilation adjustment, barometric pressure, altitude, ambient temperature, humidity, wind and proximity terms of external objects.
The performance monitor also produce escores that reflect the cubic relation that there is between dynamic fluidity, force despendendida and speed in the same way that occur when you this in water (double the speed requires an increase eight time in the spent force or alternately, speed up in 10% will go requires an increase of 33% in force)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OBS: OF Celso R. FILETTI
INTERESTING THAT CONCEPT
WHETHER YOU ROWS To 10 KM/H And ANOTHER FRIEND To 11 KM/H OR IF YOU want TO ARRIVE To THIS SPEED ( increase of 10% in the speed) , WILL HAVE TO DO 33% MORE OF FORCE IN THE ROWING TO INCREASE FROM 10 TO 11KM/H.
It is A LITTLE DIFFICULT to INCREASE 33% OF FORCE, BELIEVE I WHO am BETTER to TRY TO IMPROVE REMADA,MELHORAR The TECHNIQUE , ETC..

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The EFFECT OF THE CORPOREAL WEIGHT And OF THE WEIGHT OF THE VESSEL IN THE PERFORMANCE


A very important factor that ergométrico not take it! directly in counts what it is user's weight and the effects that this can usually have in the speed of the boat in water. larger athletes have an advantage in ergométrico, once that your larger weight provides them the potential of producing force larger expenditure (aerobic and anaerobic).
When we compete in a vessel in water, this advantage and alternately denied by the effect of the corporeal weight in the drag of the vessel.

The drag of the canoe is proportional to the immersed surface of the vessel and this is proportionally (equalizando everything) to the total weight (weight of the rower canoe) relative by force in two terços.Isto means that the increase of the drag of the canoe is proportionally smaller to the increase of the weight of the canoe or rower (duplicate the weight of the canoe and rower only had resulted in 58,7% of increase in the drag of the canoe: 2 =1,5787).

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

OBS: OF Celso R. FILETTI
THAT MEANS THAT IF YOU And The CANOE HAS 90 KG FOR EXAMPLE

A) OC1 15 KG + ROWER 75 KG = 90 KG
B) OC1 30 KG + ROWER 150 KG = 170 KG

YOU WILL HAVE 58,7% IN EXCESS OF DRAG, GO ARRENDONDAR FOR 60% TO FACILITATE THE ACCOUNTS , THIS COMPARAÇAO Is A LITTLE DIFFICULT , BECAUSE The DIFFERENCE OF THE CASE A) FOR The CASE B) Is ENORMOUS And DOES NOT HAPPEN IN FACT
I did UMATABELA TO SIMPLIFY

ROWER CANOE (WEIGHT) % OF DRAG

90 KG ------------------------------------------- X ( UMAVARIÁVEL)
180 KG-(increase of 100% weight)------------ 60% IN EXCESS OF DRAG THAT X
135 KG –(increase of 50% weight)-------------30% IN EXCESS OF ARRASTOQUE X
112,5 KG-(increase of 25% weight)------------15% IN EXCESS OF DRAG THAT X
99 KG –(increase of 10% weight)---------------6% IN EXCESS OF DRAG THAT X

THEREFORE SHOULD TRY TO LOWER The WEIGHT OF THE CANOE And ATHLETE , WITHOUT LOSING RESISTENCIA DA EMBARCAÇAO And ATELTA's Force

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Curiosity, aerobicses capacity is not; as generally it believes, directly proportional to the weight of the body, but yes proportional for factors of corporeal surface (surface of area of the alveoluses, red cells, mitocôndrias, etc.). what we put in equation to the weight expressed corporeal in force for two thirds. Therefore everything equaliza itself. larger athlete has larger aerobicses capacities in terms of absolute (L/min), -- Smaller athletes have larger aerobicses capacities due to your weight (ML/ Kg/ Min) put varied sizes athletes has equal aerobics capacity, when it expresses neutrally, relative to the corporeal surface or weight for force in two thirds.

what this means is that in proofs of resistance (races with more than ten minutes of duration) where aerobics capacity is the decisive factor, the psychological advantage of larger weight is highly neutralized by the effect of the weight of the body in the drag of the canoe. Although the larger athlete still owns some advantage due to the weight of the canoe (or distribution of the weight of this in a manned boat) constitute a relatively smaller proportion to their corporeal weights (15kg n Oc1 represents an additional weight of 15% to an athlete of 100kg in at 20 additional opposition for an athlete of 75 kg representing a little less than 1% of the advantage of time of the athlete of 100kg: 3v1.20:1.15=1,0095)

In races of small moves away (proofs of less of a minute) where the anaerobic capacity is the decisive factor, the advantage for the larger athlete is more evident. This gives because anaerobic potential and directly proportional force to the weight of the body (equalizando itself everything), therefore a rower of 100kg can produce potentially 33,3% more anaerobic force than a rower of 75kg. (100:75=1,333), however only incurs in ditos 17,8% in excess of drag in a C1 of 15kg(115:90=1,178) what gives to the larger athlete an advantage 4,2do time


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

OBS: OF Celso R. FILETTI
TRAIN FIRING And ENDURANCE TO IMPROVE HER ANAEROBIC CAPACITY And AEROBICS .

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



In manned boats larger athletes tend to have a more defined advantage because the bit of weigh corporal that each rower has to load consisted a larger weight, put distributed along all the canoe and divided by your rowers .Depending on the terms of the race, the pilot (vogue) will have of being loaded by the other rowers.

force factors for weight, fat versus percentile of tônus muscular, good form, ability levels, etc. Anything against... I talk for common people! Ed.).
For example, if someone supposes that all about the weight of an O.C.6 belongs to 200kg and the conductor ( vogue) weigh 75kg, thence you. Faces a situation where gave to get five rowers, dividing 275kg of additional weight (55kg each addition). For a rower of 100 kg this constitutes 55% of his weight, while for a rower of 75kg this represents 73,3%. This represents a crew of 100kg each one potential advantage of time's of 2,5% in a race of 100 km each one potential advantage of time's of 2,5% in a resistance race and 5,8% of advantage in a race to the short distance.


EXCUSES FOR WEIGH CORPORAL IN ERGOMÉTRICO

The rower ergométrico conceptual and the adapter for rower are invaluable tools for training, specific tests for rowing parameters, monitoração of utilization for tripulantes adjustment and selection. However the effect of the corporeal weight should be considered, when inquiries for tripulantes selection are done. Nowadays world classifications in the adapter for rowed there are for 100mim and 30min of duration. Such mensurations represented stages excelentemente representative for tripulantes tests and selection in proofs of marathon or of short distance respectively. formulas next will allow you to correct initial mensurations for current carrying in counts the effect of the corporeal weight of the rower in the real speed of the boat. To simplify the marks are corrected for the nominal weight standard of a rower of 100kg.


CRITÉRIO/ BOAT FORMULATES OF CORRECTION P/ TIME'S TEST

Comparison rower's Psychological Neutral Weight (kg) x Time (seg.) 100

O.C.1 rower's Weight (kg) +18 x Time
118

O.C.6 (conductor rowing) Weight of the rower (kg) +33 x Time
133

O.C.6(stopped conductor) Weight of the rower (kg) +55 x Time 155
Distance test (30 minutes)
Comparison rower's Psychological neutral Weight (kg) x Distance(m) 100

O.C.1 rower's Weight (kg) +18 x Distance(m) 118

O.C.6(conductor rowing) Weight of the rower (kg) +33 x Distance(m) 133

O.C.6(stopped conductor) Weight of the rower (kg) + 55x Distance
155

Whether the items of the formulates above are above of their or the weighing of the boat is not well-known. Then the next simplified tables to give him-ão an estimate close for elite men (it formulates her and the tables summarize an OC1's total weight of 18 kg , O.C.6 of 200 kg with a conductor weighing 75 kg).4.5V should be applied to the first part of parêntesis each formulates instead of force expression of O.222.


Correction factors To Weigh Corporal of the Masculine Elite
(fittings for kilo to above or below 100 kg)

OC6 Conductor OC6 Conductor remante OC1 Neutral-Psicologico Equivalent
(all based on more or less

0,38 0,45 0,52 0,62 More than 1000 meters.
10,2m 12,5m 14,3m 17,3m More than 30 minutes.




OBS: OF Celso R. FILETTI
THAT MEANS THAT IF VOCE WANTS TO DO A TEST IN A TEAM IN THE OAR ERGOMÉTRICO TO EVALUATE PERFORMACE DOS ATHLETES FOR A SELEÇAO OF ROWERS ,IT CAN'T EQUAL THE ATHLETES IF THEY HAS DIFFERENT WEIGHT . IN THE OAR ERGOMÉTRICO DOES NOT EXIST THE FACTOR DRAG OF THE EMBARCAÇAO. FOR SO MUCH SUCH TABLES ACIMAS CORRECT THIS PHASE DISPLACEMENT OF WEIGH DIFERENRE BETWEEN ATHLETES.



Records Mundiais/classificações annual

world classifications in the adapter for rowing are launched annually and can be visualized in the net in http://www.maquinaderemada.com Anyone can have your mark included in the world classifications.

How to register your tempo/distancia in the classifications of 1999

Send e-mail or message via phone of your registration including name, age (in May date 99), weight, address, time in 100 meters or moves away in half hours. The restricted of your rower should be fitting of the form that you escolher.Porém owes the same the whole time tries before to see which adjustment is more efficient for você.Caso you intend to register a new remembers mundial.Geral or in your category, have a person to watch her rowing and to sign as testemunha.Para that you register in the adapter's annual classification for remada,você should send his even registration arrival in Riviera Vermont until day 1° May of ano.Você should use an adapter for rowings Riviera Vermont and rower ergom étrico conceito11 e-mail for: info@maquinaderemada.com
or telefona/fax : USES #802 472 827.


Classifications related for sexo,peso and age.


Carry Limited Weighed Medium
Masculine 68kg 68,1-81,6 kg 81,7-95,3kg 95,3kg
Feminine 50kg 50,6-63,5kg 63,6-77,1kg 77,1kg
Class for age 18/ 18-29/ 30-39/ 40-49/ 50-59/ 60-69/ 70-79




world records in January 1999


Masculino 100m Country Age Time Name Medir/500m
Limitless Danny Toplfer Australia 27’ 3:41,2 1:50:6
Weighed Leo Younus Australia 37 3:33,8 1:46:9
Medium John Foti USA 34 3:58,2 1:59:1
Carry Kevin Kwok Canada 17 4:28,2 2:09:1
Masculine 30minutos
Limitless Danny topler Australia 27 7117m 2:06.5
Weighed Leo young Australia 37 7512m 1:59:8
Medium Chris Maynard Australia 35 6611m 2:16:1
Feminine 100m
Limitless Cindy Vider Ppel USA 37 4:52:6 2:26:3
Weighed Lisa Curry-Kenny Australia 36 4:56:7 2:28:3
Meido Virginia Andreson Australia 37 5:56:7 2:28:3
It carries Naomi Kphan USA 35 6:32:5 3:16:2
Feminine 30minutos
Limitless Cindy Vider Foes USA 37 5837m 2:32:6
Weighed Jasmin Kelly Australia 20 5672m 2:38:7
Medium Virginia Anderson Australia 37 5709m 2:37:7
Carry Jan Driesback USA 36 5095m 2:56:6




SOURCE: KANU CULTURE – VOLUME V- 1999

TRANSLATED And ADPTADOPORCELO Ribeiro FILETTI
See site : http://www.concept2.com
OBS: THE EXAMPLES THAT GAVE AND THE ACCOUNTS THAT FIZ,SAO SIMPLY TO HELP THE BY CANOES HAWAIIAN ROWERS And EVALUATE The INFLUENCE OF THE WEIGHT OF THE ROWER , OF THE SPEED GAIN, ETC.. AND STILL ABOUT THE OAR INDOOR- CONCEPT II – THAT IS A TOOL OF UNEQUALED TRAININGS .